The situation warranted II

The one nice day I was attacked by spiral stenosis, it was sometime in latter months of the year 2005. It was not possible for me to go for private clinics or worst still the private specialist or hospital as my business was not well performed but only surviving. It was not possible for me to go for public hospital orthopedic specialist without a reference letter from the public clinics.

It was under doctrine of situation warranted of their own, I was not given any later of reference. I was given only pain killer. The pain killer pills of the quality I was given, I was told to consume when necessary.  They are capable of damaging my other internal organs. Finally I was given letter of reference at the beginning of year 2006. It was submitted to the public hospital orthopedic specialist and I was getting an appointment on 3 of April 2006.

It was under whose doctrine of situation warranted, I wonder? Does it mean aged is entitled for electric shocking pain suffering? Or does it mean aged and less well off only suffer? Does it really mean there is doctrine of situation warranted for aged and not well off needed to have sufferings? Oh! I am really wondering?

It is a saying, bad luck always a double. It was not enough to suffer the spiral stenosis, the electric shocking pain. It was follow by another attack, I was suffering gastro disorder and I am still suffering and under treatment.  I was given a big name of medical term that I cannot remember.  It was the result of my first gastro scope.  They confirmed I had stomach ulcers and duodenum illness that could develop into cancer. 

Again I needed letter of reference from the public clinic for the appointment of the public hospital gastro specialist. I was complaining to the public clinic of my constantly stomach upset for the last few years and the complaints was made known in beginning of the year 2006.  Complaints also included passing motions with black color discharges and pain in upper abdomen.

Once again, the doctrine of situation warranted was not applied to the well being of me.  Do I really so bad in my luck that I do not have the privileges of being aged and be helped? However this time it was different I have met an Angel Female doctor who was treating my spiral stenosis.  She took heed of my complaints and disregarded others by issued letter of reference even she was not supposed to do so and possibly facing discipline action by the authority of the public hospital.  She was the only one who really took the doctrine of situation warranted by heart so long in my case and it was. She is an orthopedic specialist not a general practice.

Assisted by the Angel, my appointment with the gastro specialist was fixed on 08 June 2006. It was confirmed prima facie I had a gastro case and the first gastro scope was fixed on that day for 12 July 2006.  The scope confirmed I had stomach ulcers and duodenum illness that could develop into cancer.  Treatment I was received by drugs taking. The first dose course of one month medicine from 08 June 2006 to 12 July 2006, the medicine failed as the scope shown the seriousness of the gastro disorders. The second dose course, the medicine changed to Ranitidine tablets and I was told the Ranitidine tablets was stronger than the first doze course.

The second scope done on 01 Nov 2006, it was having no improvement and medicine changed again and I was told it was the strongest. It was Prazole group.  The third scope, it was done on 17 Jan 2007, no improvement and taking the Prazole group of different brand and manufacturers. The forth scope on 06 May 2008, no improvement and gas in stomach was visible, Prazole medicine continuing. The fifth scope was done on 05 Jan 2010, improvement was concluded and I was told no ulcers were visible but my complaints persistent especially early in the morning, continuing taking Prazole tablets.

Routine gastro appointments in between scopes, it was somewhere after the fifth scope, memory not very well as it did not reflected in my record (my appointment cards details).  I was given a change of medicine from Prazole to Ranitidine tablets for three months as my fifth scope was done on 05 Jan 2010, it indicated improvement with no ulcers visible. Thereafter the sixth scope was done on 16 March 2011. The ulcers coming back and I was asked why it could happen as it was no ulcers visible in the fifth scope.  The only reason I could provide, it was the change of medicine and I was not taking heed of my complaints. The Prazole was given again. 

The doctrine of situation warranted was not in favor for me again when I was attaining my routine appointment of the gastro specialist right after my sixth scope in 16 March 2011.  I was told by the specialist on that appointment that I need not to have any treatment further and ready for discharge. It confused me by the facts, I was scope for no ulcers visible and medicine changed, thereafter scoped again and ulcers visible and yet I was told I was ready for discharge. Why such a doctrine of situation warranted being applied to me all the time? Is it my aged life truly does not have any value at all? Why must I facing such a doctrine of situation warranted? Oh!  What could I do? I have nothing to say but utter the words of I am truly wondering?

Next Topic:  The situation warranted III

Please do double click the sites, in The Banners for more details and prices of their products and services.

==============================================

Please click the "Blog Archive “at the right side of this blog for more readings. Click the Online Hypermarket,  Discounted Hypermarket and  RingAcall Hypermarket for more products and services.

==============================================